Kentucky Adult Educators Literacy Institute
"A WebQuest Adventure in Literacy"

Western Kentucky University

 

Criteria and Points for Evaluation

Beginning

0-69

Developing

70-79

Accomplished

 80-89

Exemplary

90-100

Ø       Identifies appropriate content built around learners needs and interests  Fails to identify appropriate content built around learners needs and interests

Somewhat   identifies appropriate content built around learners needs and interests

Identifies appropriate content built around learners needs and interests Outstanding job in identifying  appropriate content built around learners needs and interests
Ø       Evidence of sound knowledge of learners strengths and weaknesses No Evidence of sound knowledge of learners strengths and weaknesses Some Evidence of sound knowledge of learners strengths and weaknesses Much Evidence of sound knowledge of learners strengths and weaknesses Outstanding job of locating Evidence of sound knowledge of learners strengths and weaknesses
Ø       Themes, tasks and ideas developed to meet appropriate and relevant literacy outcomes No Themes, tasks and ideas developed to meet appropriate and relevant literacy outcomes Some Themes, tasks and ideas developed to meet appropriate and relevant literacy outcomes Many Themes, tasks and ideas developed to meet appropriate and relevant literacy outcomes Outstanding job of generating Themes, tasks and ideas developed to meet appropriate and relevant literacy outcomes
Ø       Documents comprehensive understanding of the connections between evaluation, curriculum and instruction  Does not Document comprehensive understanding of the connections between evaluation, curriculum and instruction Documents some  comprehensive understanding of the connections between evaluation, curriculum and instruction Good job in documenting   comprehensive understanding of the connections between evaluation, curriculum and instruction Outstanding job in documenting  comprehensive understanding of the connections between evaluation, curriculum and instruction
Ø       Evidence of  development of theory of literacy learning No Evidence of  development of theory of literacy learning

Some Evidence of  development of theory of literacy learning

 

Much Evidence of  development of theory of literacy learning   Outstanding Evidence of  development of theory of literacy learning

 

 

Ø       Evidence of connection between theory and practice No Evidence of connection between theory and practice Some Evidence of connection between theory and practice Much Evidence of connection between theory and practice Outstanding Evidence of connection between theory and practice
Proper format; submitted by due date; complete.  No Proper format; submitted by due date; complete.  Some Proper format; submitted by due date; complete.  Much Proper format; submitted by due date; complete.  Outstanding Proper format; submitted by due date; complete. 

 


Peer Visits Research    

Western Kentucky University

By Dr. Pam Petty - pam@pampetty.com
Copyright ©
2002 - 2006 -- All Rights Reserved

This site may not be copied, reproduced, distributed, republished, uploaded, posted, or transmitted in any way without the prior written consent of Dr. Pam Petty. Prior permission must be granted before linking to this webpage.
Exception:  2005-2006 WKU LTCY 444/G students, LTCY  421/G students have permission to print these materials for purposes of university course participation. 

http://edtech.wku.edu/~kaeli/kaeli.htm

07/22/05 06:06:04 PM    Hit Counter